Is this a good Video Card Choice?

Integrating 3D models with photography

Interested in integrating your 3D work with the real world? This might help

Watch

# 1 09-09-2003 , 10:33 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002

Location: MELville

Posts: 1,100

I'm out looking for a new card and somebody suggested this:

https://www.newegg.com/app/viewProduc...102-307&depa=1

aprt from the price, what else is bad? user added image

Thanks

-Emo

Quote

# 2 20-09-2003 , 09:20 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 2

I think it's the PRICE!!!Why not try 3dlabs Wildcat VP series?Priced just fair and rocks in performance.

Quote

# 3 20-09-2003 , 12:36 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002

Location: MELville

Posts: 1,100

because I heard the wildcats are bad in hardware rendering....maybe it's falce but who knows...

and thanks for replying... at least somebody did ( user added image

)

-Emo

Quote

# 4 21-09-2003 , 09:24 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Nov 2002

Location: Australia

Posts: 360

cool card, pricey but cool.....i wish i had one of them.

MSN: mizin_alex@hotmail.com
E-MAIL: mizina@alphalink.com.au

Quote

# 5 02-10-2003 , 12:24 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003

Location: vienna - austria

Posts: 14

id go for the quadro fx 500
costs not much
is as fast as fx 3000

hw rendering its not THAT fast
but vievport is real good

i read a benchmark with all the new pro cards
i think its on 3dchips.com

Quote

# 6 02-10-2003 , 01:23 PM

Kevin

Guest

Posts: n/a

wow for $839.00 I would expect nothing wrong with it! Thats a crazy price - not worth it IMO

Quote

# 7 07-10-2003 , 10:59 PM

Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2002

Location: Plantation, Florida

Posts: 1,568

The Fire GL X2 256 is ATI's highest performance workstation graphics card. Thats a real workhorse. I've seen it at work at SIGGRAPH last year. Read about it here.

https://www.ati.com/products/fireglx2-256/index.html

Dave Baer
Professor of Digital Arts
Digital Media Arts College
Boca Raton, Florida
dbaer@dmac.edu

Quote

# 8 08-10-2003 , 02:46 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002

Location: MELville

Posts: 1,100

yup, that's why I want it so bad user added image

I'm trying to go for at least a 256MB Video card...

for now, I'll have to wait and I'll get my CPUs first because they are the most expencive and then I'll start saving for this baby!

-Emo

Quote

# 9 26-10-2003 , 12:51 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Oct 2002

Location: Haifa, Israel

Posts: 437

Get the Quadro FX500

Nir

Nir Sullam
Architectural Visualizations Page: www.orvatsel.com/index2.html
Maya Page: www.orvatsel.com/maya
www.nirsullam.com

Quote

# 10 27-10-2003 , 01:09 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jul 2002

Location: MELville

Posts: 1,100

Originally posted by nirsul
Get the Quadro FX500

Nir

Originally Posted by

because....?

-Emo

Quote

# 11 27-10-2003 , 06:31 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Oct 2002

Location: Haifa, Israel

Posts: 437

It will do the job for a lot less and in some reviews I read that the speed jumps between the FX500 and his stronger bros is not that noticeable.

And you can even have Hardware rendering.(though I have heard it wouldn't yield the same quality as a regular software renderer)

one thing thoguh - it is a bit noisier.

nir

Nir Sullam
Architectural Visualizations Page: www.orvatsel.com/index2.html
Maya Page: www.orvatsel.com/maya
www.nirsullam.com

Last edited by nirsul; 27-10-2003 at 06:36 AM.

Quote

Reply to this thread