64-Bit

Complex UV Layout in Maya

Over the last couple of years UV layout in Maya has changed for the better. In this course we're going to be taking a look at some of those changes as we UV map an entire character

Watch

# 1 03-06-2007 , 01:53 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 115

just wondering if the is any benifits of using 64 bit versions of maya over 32 bit?

and i would imagine that the files are compatible between them??

"You won't get anything done by planning" - Karl Pilkington

Quote

# 2 03-06-2007 , 06:10 AM

Jr.Who

Guest

Posts: n/a

YouÕre using a 64 bit computer, right? user added image

Quote

# 3 03-06-2007 , 08:50 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 115

i am yeah.
was just wondering if there was much of a difference between them

"You won't get anything done by planning" - Karl Pilkington

Quote

# 4 03-06-2007 , 08:54 AM

Jr.Who

Guest

Posts: n/a

Originally posted by wod
i am yeah.
was just wondering if there was much of a difference between them

Originally Posted by

The files should be compatible, yes. I think the advantages of having 64 bit Maya on a 64 computer would be:

1. Maya is all around faster
2. Maya consumes less RAM

Although, there probably are some other advantages (Just Google it and see what you find), but thatÕs all I could think of.
user added image

Quote

# 5 03-06-2007 , 09:00 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 115

ok cool, thanks

"You won't get anything done by planning" - Karl Pilkington

Quote

# 6 03-06-2007 , 11:32 PM

Moderator
Join Date: May 2005

Location: Manchester Uk

Posts: 6,300

I dont know how it would consume less RAM running on a 64 bit system, it would however be able to use more RAM (if its available of course) than the limit on a 32 bit version.

"No pressure, no diamonds" Thomas Carlyle

Quote

# 7 04-06-2007 , 12:45 AM

Senior Software Developer
Join Date: Jan 2005

Location: Livingston, Scotland

Posts: 1,701

The only differnce between 64 and 32 bit is calculation times on the processor.

64bit is allegdly faster than 32bit. But I have yet to see proof. Dual or Quad Core is the way ahead for speed. I kinda think 64bit is falling on its arse tbh, there is very little support out there for it atm. Stick with 32bit and go dual core...

Chris (formerly R@nSiD)
Twitter
When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will truely know peace - Jimmy Hendrix

Winner SM VFX Challenge 1

3rd Place SM SteamPunk Challenge (May 2007)

Quote

# 8 04-06-2007 , 02:42 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2004

Posts: 115

yeh i have dual core already (AMD64 5000+ 2.6Ghz Dual core) and have a dual boot computer with windows vista 64 so i just thought i would try and utilise it as its there!

"You won't get anything done by planning" - Karl Pilkington

Quote

# 9 05-06-2007 , 06:28 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: /dev/null

Posts: 891

R@nSiD > '64bit is allegdly faster than 32bit. But I have yet to see proof.'

64 bit is only faster for double precision fixed point instructions in programs that support it. For floating point, 64 bit CPUs don't perform any better just becuase they are 64 bit since x86 CPUs have 80 bit FPUs since the 1990s.

C. P. U. Its not a big processor... Its a series of pipes!

Quote