I'm making a hole in the wall using the Boolean function and my success is tenuous at best. It fails and looks crappy initially, but renders fine.
In the prep phase, I created a wall and an object to be used for the boolean operation.
I pushed the "green object" through the wall so that it intersects completely.
I selected the wall, THEN the green object and chose Mesh > Boolean > Difference and voila! ... a hole. But appearances can be deceiving as I have just created an n-gon that contains many edges and results in non-quads. There is a fix though...
I selected the faces around the inside of the hole and delete them.
I then selected an edge or two and then from the menu chose Select>Select Contiguous Edges but had to double-check to make sure the entire edge was selected.
Then I chose the Edit Mesh>Extrude command and pushing inward on the Green Arrow, I created a slight bevel.
I chose Extrude again and immediately switched to the Move tool and pushed the edge backwards until the edge was aligned with the back of the wall.
I created yet another bevel to close the gap...
I merged the paired-up vertices to complete the operation.
This is the result! I've performed this operation a half-dozen times, being careful to keep things clean, but the result is the same each time. The kicker is, it looks perfectly fine when it's rendered.
BUT, if I use the Mesh>Smooth command it ruins the hole and rendering no longer works. Is this everyone else's result? If not, what am I doing wrong?
I think this is a great question as Im forever wanting to make extruded like indents in surfaces, but the split poly's tool can be quite a long process. That booleans post with the cylinder 'stamping' the cylindrical shape into the cube looks like it could be the answer, but I have tried this on one of my models, and when i did an error message came up saying:must have exactly 2 polygons selected. ???
The way I used it was, im modelling a keyboard, and the cylinder/booleans thing I was going to use for the headphones socket. So the keyboard body itself has already had quite a bit of work, so the only difference between the example in the post and mine was that two basic primitives were used rather than a more complex model, but the body of my keyboard was just a cube to start, ive beveled in some areas and extruded a bit, but at heart its just a cube. IT looks great in the example so why wont it work for me do you think?
cut out by hand using the split poly tool its really not that hard
draw on the surface so you have enough vert for the shape.
line uup the other object on the surface of what u r wanting to extract. use snap to point(vert) option and move into plae.
delete inner face
extrude in
dup -1 to mirror and join the vert
this technique works even if u want to cut out circles doesnt matter what shape u want
You don't have to smooth first, you just have to clean up the geometry after the boolean command, which hasn't been done in this case. It's collapsing because the face around the archway has so many verts, it's never going to subdivide cleanly. Adding in some more edges and tidying it up would fix it and you could smooth it again if you needed to.
no you dont have to do smooth first...its just easier....I use booleans all the time and yes your way dave is a neater geo but a lot of work. I have used both methods and it depends on the geo. If you look at the jetpack on my marine it would have been a lot of work with the split poly tool...so I smoothed first and did it the easy way. You also have to presplit the 2nd surface because you cant do it after the boolean...as I said it depends on how complex the geo is in which way I do it.
bullet1968
"A Darkness at Sethanon", a book I aspire to model some of the charcters and scenes
You may not post new threads |
You may not post replies |
You may not post attachments |
You may not edit your posts |
BB code is On |
Smilies are On |
[IMG] code is On |
HTML code is Off