Introduction to Maya - Modeling Fundamentals Vol 2
This course will look in the fundamentals of modeling in Maya with an emphasis on creating good topology. It's aimed at people that have some modeling experience in Maya but are having trouble with complex objects.
# 1 24-12-2013 , 02:35 PM
minkumis's Avatar
Prasoon Mishra
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 17
# 2 25-12-2013 , 09:19 PM
NextDesign's Avatar
Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,988
Cool. Is there any reason why you used fluids instead of particles?


Imagination is more important than knowledge.
# 3 29-12-2013 , 09:00 AM
minkumis's Avatar
Prasoon Mishra
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 17
thx..
Well, right now am concentrating of fluids so I use it as possible as I can. And I think fluids have more control than particles in some case without using external forces.
What do you think ? Which one should I use ? some suggestions would be appreciated. user added image

# 4 29-12-2013 , 06:21 PM
NextDesign's Avatar
Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,988
Particles come to my mind first when it comes to dust, as it's not really a fluid, but a bunch of particles user added image

I don't think there's a right or wrong way to do it, I was simply wondering why you chose to use fluids.

With your test, it seems that when the balls hit, there is a realistic amount of dust thrown up; however when they roll, a huge amount is emitted. I think if you had a dirt floor, which is where the dust would be coming from, it would stop them from rolling as it has much more resistance to movement than a frictionless plane like you have now. By stopping them from moving with the dirt, you would also remove the extra emissions.

That's my only critique from what I can see. Nice job.


Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Last edited by NextDesign; 29-12-2013 at 06:24 PM.
# 5 30-12-2013 , 06:43 AM
minkumis's Avatar
Prasoon Mishra
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 17
Ya you are right .. actually I didnt worked on emission on this. My goal was to make effect when ball hit the ground, dust emits. Emission of fluids isnt a big deal.
Thanks for the observation user added image user added image

# 6 31-12-2013 , 04:40 AM
NextDesign's Avatar
Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,988
Here's how I did it quickly with nParticles just in case you're curious. It's essentially a particle collision event that emits particles on the first collision of each particle. Those emitted particles then have animated opacity and radius over their lifetimes. The particles are killed off once they are fully transparent, in order to keep the scene quick.


Dust simulation with nParticles - YouTube

Scene attached.

Attached Files
File Type: zip dustSim.ma.zip (11.4 KB, 346 views)

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Last edited by NextDesign; 31-12-2013 at 04:42 AM.
# 7 01-01-2014 , 05:54 PM
minkumis's Avatar
Prasoon Mishra
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 17
Its nice effort...user added image
But I think all those particles are creating the same dust shape and opacity, also for first collision only.
What I tried, was to emit dust differently for each particle and for every collision.

# 8 01-01-2014 , 09:16 PM
NextDesign's Avatar
Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,988
Yes, they are showing the same shape, however you can change that by using a sprite. I also forced them to only emit on the first bounce, as generally when an object hits a dusty floor, it only has one large puff of dust, as the dirt on the ground usually dampens the future bounces.


Imagination is more important than knowledge.
Posting Rules Forum Rules
You may not post new threads | You may not post replies | You may not post attachments | You may not edit your posts | BB code is On | Smilies are On | [IMG] code is On | HTML code is Off

Similar Threads