cluster deformer problem

Interested in integrating your 3D work with the real world? This might help

# 1 15-10-2014 , 05:19 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014

Posts: 18

I am using cluster deformer to simulate paper folding. As far as folding concerned, there is no problem. Everything works fine. Here I am showing a corner folding using cluster deformer.

The problem is when I render it, the back side shows dark area (I expect that it should be white in all area). There is no overlapping between paper since the rotation is only 179 degrees. I am using an ambient light, so there is no shadow involved here.

Any comments would be very much appreciated. Thanks.

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: rendering.jpg
Views: 382
Size: 199.3 KB
ID: 56193

Attached Images

Quote

# 2 15-10-2014 , 05:42 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012

Posts: 293

you need to enable double sided faces for your mesh. heres how you do it in arnold https://support.solidangle.com/displ...e+Sided+Shader

if you are rendering with a diffrent render engine, google it and im sure you will find sulotions for this user added image

20 year old guy from Sweden

Big Bob Marley fan
Love skateboarding
Maya, Mudbox and Photoshop user

Full name: Marcus Ralman

https://www.facebook.com/MarcusRalman3D

^ My facebook page ^

Quote

# 3 15-10-2014 , 05:56 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014

Posts: 18

The double sided shader are already included. That is not the problem. You could see the back shader from the rendered image.

Last edited by muonium; 15-10-2014 at 05:58 PM.

Quote

# 4 15-10-2014 , 06:10 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014

Posts: 18

I figured out the problem. Harden edge solves the problem.

Quote

# 5 20-10-2014 , 09:36 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012

Posts: 293

aha, glad you solved it mate!

20 year old guy from Sweden

Big Bob Marley fan
Love skateboarding
Maya, Mudbox and Photoshop user

Full name: Marcus Ralman

https://www.facebook.com/MarcusRalman3D

^ My facebook page ^

Quote

Reply to this thread