Complex UV Layout in Maya
Over the last couple of years UV layout in Maya has changed for the better. In this course we're going to be taking a look at some of those changes as we UV map an entire character
# 31 26-08-2003 , 11:20 PM
Zyk0tiK's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 800
Woo hoo!

# 32 27-08-2003 , 08:43 AM
gazzamataz's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Planet Apple MacTosh
Posts: 523
Oh god... I haven't even opened the box for Photoshop 7 yet.

Gonna have to give up work and spend the time keeping up with the upgrades user added image

MY BRAIN HURTS!!!


Tickety boo and ta ta for a bit...
Gazzamataz
https://www.gazzamataz.com
# 33 02-09-2003 , 11:11 PM
carrot juice's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 346
I think that Maya is by far the best 3d package out there... user added image

user added imageuser added image
user added imageuser added imageuser added imageuser added imageuser added image

# 34 03-09-2003 , 03:08 AM
R-Tillery's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 966
But the most expensive company to buy from.

# 35 03-09-2003 , 03:16 AM
mtmckinley's Avatar
The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,245
Max costs more than Maya Complete.

Least it did last time I checked.

# 36 03-09-2003 , 03:21 AM
R-Tillery's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 966
Yea Complete,, but Unlimited ?

# 37 03-09-2003 , 03:22 AM
mtmckinley's Avatar
The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,245
Unlimited isn't really worth getting in my opinion. Nothing on it that I need that Complete doesn't have or can't mimic in some form.

Complete works perfectly well.

# 38 03-09-2003 , 03:28 AM
R-Tillery's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ventura California
Posts: 966
I'm not sure so I'm asking,, dose it have fur and water wave?

# 39 03-09-2003 , 03:39 AM
mtmckinley's Avatar
The Maya Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8,245
Nope.

But then, I don't need those things. user added image

# 40 10-09-2003 , 01:39 PM
slickrenderer's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Zurich/London
Posts: 663
Guys I posted/started this topic. What I meant was Maya 5.5 and not Maya 6:-)
Lack of sleep does that sometimes (all the time)


grrrr
# 41 10-09-2003 , 04:10 PM
gazzamataz's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Planet Apple MacTosh
Posts: 523
Talking of Maya 5, I have just been looking at it's new features, especially the character rigging and animation ones. Well, I could fall flat on my back cos I just seen some new constraints added (Parent) and a new option for keeping the offsets.

For those of you who haven't done character animation these are a real bonus! They endear Maya 5 to me immediately. Now I can make my character walk along with his hat on, take it off and leave it on the table without having to make different versions and invisible hats user added image user added image user added image

Funny thing is (KEVIN - I HOPE YOU ARE READING THIS) that I have been able to do this in A:M for several years user added image user added image user added image

But now I can do it in Maya without the crashing...

Just a bit of excitement for us character animators!


Tickety boo and ta ta for a bit...
Gazzamataz
https://www.gazzamataz.com
# 42 11-09-2003 , 08:58 AM
train_ucl's Avatar
user title spammer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 195
i love my maya unlimited ... the Maya Live tool is GREAT , and cloth is FUN, an fur i never used user added image

but i only got a student licence of unlimited .. because it was CHEAPER than the student licence of complete (they had a few unlimited promo packs left but no complete promo packs user added image )

# 43 02-10-2003 , 05:17 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Barranquilla, Colombia
Posts: 4
I think that 7k for a program that does not render particles in itself but need aftereffect to post process it is a nonsense for the "Academy Award software"

# 44 02-10-2003 , 05:44 AM
Zyk0tiK's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 800
Yeah but its super awesome.

# 45 02-10-2003 , 09:18 AM
gazzamataz's Avatar
Subscriber
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Planet Apple MacTosh
Posts: 523

I think that 7k for a program that does not render particles in itself but need aftereffect to post process it is a nonsense for the "Academy Award software"

I never understood this either. I started 3D with Cinema4D whcih had particles which didn't need compositing afterwards, then I moved onto Animation Master which didn't need it either.

Is there some advatage not being able render the particles within the render and having to compositing them outside of Maya? Well, I can imagine there is but why not give us the option if you don't want such a classy render for us more casual users like me user added image


Tickety boo and ta ta for a bit...
Gazzamataz
https://www.gazzamataz.com
Posting Rules Forum Rules
You may not post new threads | You may not post replies | You may not post attachments | You may not edit your posts | BB code is On | Smilies are On | [IMG] code is On | HTML code is Off

Similar Threads