Maya renderer opinions....

Digital humans the art of the digital double

Ever wanted to know how digital doubles are created in the movie industry? This course will give you an insight into how it's done.

Watch

# 1 13-05-2004 , 07:15 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 12

Hello everybody....

Surfing the net I read tons of opinions by 3d artists saying that Maya has one of the worst renderer on the market. Most of them say that it is necessary to use a thirdy part renderer as Renderman.

Why is that? What does Maya do so bad?

I am new to Maya and I would like to check myself, but I would appreciate your opinions about this.

Thanks in advance.

R.

Quote

# 2 13-05-2004 , 08:18 AM

Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2002

Location: London, UK

Posts: 2,800

maya software renderer by comparison to renderman is bad because it is much slower than the rest and can introduce rendering artefacts.

Renderman is the renderer of choice for most big companies because it is very open and can be slotted into a production pipeline with relative ease. It also offers better quality and scalability (try doing a 2k frame in renderman and then try it in maya software renderer!) Only thing is renderman is expensive whilst the maya software renderer is free.... with maya.

Alan

Technical Director - Framestore

Currently working on: Your Highness

IMDB

Quote

Reply to this thread