i am actually going to have 4 hd's in total , I like to split them up since all HD's will fail eventually at least I have some chance of saving some stuff.
still waiting on the exact cost but somewhere in the region of $6000
Neo of course you are right but I have this real phobia against large HD's it's seems to me that they fail much more often.It's only recently that I have gone with anything over 160gb, just me I know but I feel happier btw I do back up to dvd-r but sometimes not everything on the pc.
Any suggestions on maybe an improvement on the hardware?
honestly as no (bus) speeds have been posted and i haven't cared to keep up since i can no longer price a PC without pulling the dust moths out of my pockets, i can't see any bottlenecking problems with your choice of processors, ram, and video card. a raid array is certainly the safe way to go because if you lose data it can be rewritten or recovered if nothing ever happened, but at the same time if you've got 2 250 GB drives in a raid array you're only getting 250 GB of drive space... not so bad since HDs are getting cheaper, but still... you COULD have 500 GB of space like tweetytunes said. at the same time, without the raid, there's nothing wrong with an installation HD (for your programs and windows xp/vista) and a media HD (for your batch renders, after effects compositions, etc.) that would usually ensure less complications due to installed programs and the like.
technically, i think you're going the safe route and nobody should bash ya for that if you pump out quality stuff. if you're still practicing and learning, though, it's not REALLY that big a deal if you lost the model you were working on, cause you learned a lot about the process and could even speed up your modelling AND improve upon it if you had to do it over again.
I got a terabit ext hard drive with fiberwire and usb2 for £250 the other week and all my maya/photoshop/premire/flash work has found a new home there. I have 2 300 gig sata drives inside my pc with the first split in half. Never have any problems got the exturnal for moving file for home to work. I know a terabit is a bit much but for that price who cares.
Sounds like a really fast set up, I'd like to see some benchmarks when it's built. Do you plan to overclock it?
Just out of curiosity what monitor do you use?
About bottlenecks, I'm not saying that there is defantly one, but having four cores share a 1066 MHz GTL+ bus sounds a bit performance limiting to me. How much L2 cache has this processor got and has anyone seen any memory benchmarks?
This is just my opinion but having four cores with 2 MB of L2 each connected to a 1066 MHz FSB sounds like that the processor isn't going to run at peak effiecientcy.
I'm just wondering, have you thought about the CSI based Xeons with 16 MB L2 that are supposed to come out sometime in the 2nd half this year?
im not sure the quad core is gonna have enough horsepower. you sure you cant find anything with some more kick?!!! perhaps something that runs on diesel?
You may not post new threads |
You may not post replies |
You may not post attachments |
You may not edit your posts |
BB code is On |
Smilies are On |
[IMG] code is On |
HTML code is Off