WTF MAN?!?!?

Substance Painter

In this start to finish texturing project within Substance Painter we cover all the techniques you need to texture the robot character.

Watch

# 1 10-10-2007 , 10:35 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

may have been posted but... there taken over man user added image

https://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet...&siteID=123112

Quote

# 2 10-10-2007 , 10:50 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jun 2005

Location: cleveland ohio

Posts: 313

now they got mudbox? unbelievable! their going for the monopoly I bet. Watch Maya be $20,000 in the next couple years.

Quote

# 3 10-10-2007 , 11:18 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

ya... im just waiting for them to bring all ther products as a package for like $200,000 :headbang:

Quote

# 4 11-10-2007 , 12:02 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006

Location: /dev/null

Posts: 891

Looks like someone is trying to imitate a certain software company...

C. P. U. Its not a big processor... Its a series of pipes!

Quote

# 5 11-10-2007 , 01:04 AM

Moderator
Join Date: May 2005

Location: Manchester Uk

Posts: 6,300

Haha, Maya was that proce when it first came out (cheers Jay).

Yeah thats pretty old news, according to a presentation I saw the guys who developed mudbox are onboard with it and Autodesk are going to try to intergrate the pipeline between mudbox/Maya

"No pressure, no diamonds" Thomas Carlyle

Quote

# 6 12-10-2007 , 05:28 AM

Registered User
Join Date: May 2005

Location: United States

Posts: 513

Originally posted by danotronXX
now they got mudbox? unbelievable! their going for the monopoly I bet. Watch Maya be $20,000 in the next couple years.

Originally Posted by

Either that, or they needed something to compete with Pixologic's zBrush; Maya doesn't really have the uber-smooth-sculpting capabilities that zBrush has.

Quote

# 7 12-10-2007 , 08:06 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: Washington D.C

Posts: 620

I suppose Autodesk is trying to become the only modeling company out there now. I do suspect that prices for their products will increase quite a bit...

But on the bright side, Maya will have some new features, so I guess that's something to look forward to.

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man."

George Bernard Shaw - Man and Superman

Quote

# 8 12-10-2007 , 10:08 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: London

Posts: 429

boeeeeeee, boeeee, did i say booeeee

Zbrush i tell you, zbrush is cooler and i don't want to hear the word mudbox again ok :p user added image

Just joking never tried mudbox, i'm happy with zbrush, ow i guess because i get free upgrades, well hey all the zbrush 2 users get a free upgrade, so why change right.

DDTN

WIP Mooey
Mustang Fastback and the Mustang Fatback
WIP Mieke
WIP BanQuebe
The Critter ï¿½ Lulu on the walk

Quote

# 9 12-10-2007 , 10:42 AM

Moderator
Join Date: May 2003

Location: London

Posts: 1,001

mudbox is easier to learn, know maya then you know mudbox =)

Quote

# 10 12-10-2007 , 10:46 AM

Moderator
Join Date: May 2005

Location: Manchester Uk

Posts: 6,300

Thats true but it lacks a lot of the tools that make Zbrush great, texturing etc etc etc....

Mudbox is a sculpting tool, pretty much it, Z'sa lot more complete.

"No pressure, no diamonds" Thomas Carlyle

Quote

# 11 14-10-2007 , 02:20 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006

Location: Washington D.C

Posts: 620

I'm sure Maya will still be Zbrush compatable--right?....:eeek2:

Quote

# 12 14-10-2007 , 02:28 AM

Moderator
Join Date: May 2005

Location: Manchester Uk

Posts: 6,300

Yeah, if it wasnt then it would be a massive shot in the foot and I dont think that they would be that daft, its probably going to be more intergrated, say that you sculpt in mudbox then when you import to maya it automatically creates all the disp map set up with the map included on a standard material so all you do's hit render and its there.

"No pressure, no diamonds" Thomas Carlyle

Quote