What I've been up to

Interested in integrating your 3D work with the real world? This might help

# 1 04-12-2012 , 02:16 AM

Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,988

Here's what I've been up to for the last few months. Besides working full-time as a character TD, and pipeline TD, I've had some time to do a bit of freelance work. This is the result; The full model sits at 1.23 GB with full sculpted detail, as well as four 4k texture maps.

user added image

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Quote

# 2 04-12-2012 , 03:34 AM

Registered User
Join Date: May 2002

Location: Niagara Falls, Canada

Posts: 5,310

Very nice.....

I am enough of an artist to draw freely upon my imagination, knowledge is limited, imagination encircles the world. (Albert Einstein)

https://www.artstation.com/kurtb

Quote

# 3 04-12-2012 , 05:13 AM

Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: South FL

Posts: 3,522

Very nice indeed. Looks like Sarah Wayne Callies.

- Genny
__________________
::|| My CG Blog ||::
::|| My Maya FAQ ||::

Quote

# 4 04-12-2012 , 05:21 AM

Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,988

Close up of the ear: user added image

The final ear was down-ressed a bit from this version, but I tried to maintain the same edge flow.

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Last edited by NextDesign; 04-12-2012 at 05:31 AM.

Quote

# 5 04-12-2012 , 10:46 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Aug 2005

Location: Austin, TX

Posts: 496

did u actually need that hi res of a model? Why not use the Subdiv Approx?

Quote

# 6 04-12-2012 , 02:09 PM

Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,988

As I said in the topology thread, It's based on scan data, and I try to avoid sculpting as much as possible. I wanted to preserve as much detail as possible from the scan, and we would have smoothed the mesh anyways, so I built it at this resolution. This resolution is quite typical for scan-based models. The reason why you build models at low resolution normally, is so that you can tweak the model easily. Since we already have all the shapes from the scan data, we can simply use that. Plus, if I really needed to, I could go in and delete a few edge loops, and have a lower resolution mesh just like that.

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Last edited by NextDesign; 04-12-2012 at 02:12 PM.

Quote

# 7 04-12-2012 , 04:43 PM

EduSciVis-er
Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: Toronto

Posts: 3,374

Can I ask what your workflow was for retopologizing? I assume the scan data didn't give you this topology.

-stwert

Website - Blog - YouTube - Vimeo - Facebook - Twitter

-->How to Effectively Ask Questions on Forums<--

Quote

# 8 04-12-2012 , 05:42 PM

Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,988

Can I ask what your workflow was for retopologizing? I assume the scan data didn't give you this topology.

Originally Posted by stwert

No it didn't. As Mudbox lacks any type of topology tool, and I don't own zBrush, this was done manually using make live, and a couple of scripts that I wrote.

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Quote

# 9 04-12-2012 , 07:44 PM

Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: South FL

Posts: 3,522

No it didn't. As Mudbox lacks any type of topology tool, and I don't own zBrush, this was done manually using make live, and a couple of scripts that I wrote.

Originally Posted by NextDesign

I've seen make live used for that. How's that treating you, you know, along with the scripts?

- Genny
__________________
::|| My CG Blog ||::
::|| My Maya FAQ ||::

Quote

# 10 04-12-2012 , 08:29 PM

Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,988

I've seen make live used for that. How's that treating you, you know, along with the scripts?

Originally Posted by GecT

Bearable, but just...

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Quote

# 11 04-12-2012 , 10:18 PM

Lead Modeler - Framestore
Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: UK

Posts: 6,287

Good job John, I thought it was a scan from the very first image, the skull cap and tilt in the neck were an instant giveaway, still a nice job on the retopo....

You should of downloaded a 30day trial of 3dcoat, it works fine and saves and exports too even for the trial version, you could have the model done in a day from using that, including a very rough yet useable uv layout as it maps it accordingly as you model, I use 3d coat on all our scan data at work, its super fast

Jay

Quote

# 12 05-12-2012 , 04:34 AM

Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,988

Hey Jay, thanks mate!

Regarding 3d-coat; yeah I gave it a go. The ear was actually based on an output of autopo. (Really cool btw) However by the time I started looking into it deeply, I was already 80% of the way through, and had already written custom scripts to help speed it up.

Eh, doing it the hard way makes you respect the easy way user added image

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Quote

# 13 05-12-2012 , 01:05 PM

The thin red line
Join Date: Aug 2009

Location: England

Posts: 4,472

Have you any shots of the mesh before you cleaned it up.....................dave

Avatar Challenge Winner 2010

Quote

# 14 05-12-2012 , 03:33 PM

Technical Director
Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 2,988

Here's the scan data. I had manipulated it so that it's in a more neutral pose. As you can see, the ear was unusable, and very little detail in the eyes. All that was added in later.

user added image

Imagination is more important than knowledge.

Last edited by NextDesign; 05-12-2012 at 03:35 PM.

Quote

# 15 05-12-2012 , 05:02 PM

Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: Michigan, USA

Posts: 2,998

Looks really good John.

I have been playing with retopo in 3D-Coat and Dynamesh in ZBrush. I am researching a Maya to ZBrush (dynamesh and Booleans) to 3D-Coat (retopo) workflow for creating highly detailed hard surface poly shapes.

"If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Sir Isaac Newton, 1675

Quote

Reply to this thread