rendertest.zip (7.6 KB, 213 views)
That'll do donkey... that'll do...
#
27
08-01-2004
, 03:27 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Yeah, well my Apple G4 1 GHZ Dual did the test scene in 8:12! That's right! Take that.
Longer is better, right? (joke)
Strangely, I got around 4:30 at home on a DP 867 (slower machine). I think the 8:12 may have been because I rendered while I had about fifteen apps open and continued working in them. Still a terrible time on both machines.
Well, at least I've got quality multi-tasking to keep me going for a while. In OS X, I can capture an entire DV tape, render in After Effects, download a 100 MB file, print high quality files to the inkjet, burn CDs and watch DVDs all at the same time with no perceived slowdown, crashes or hiccups (well, maybe a belch here and there). Not bad for a two year old machine.
Now if Alias can just get that code more cooperative with the G5s (1 GIG FS bus) and take advantage if its utterly monstrous architecture, I'd be a happy camper.
It seems the equivalent G5s are about twice as slow right now (in Maya), or half as fast if you prefer. That's with no G5 code whatsoever, so it will be interesting to see what the next release gets us on (me) on that proc.
------
Hux-By "viewport monster" I assume you mean putting more money into the graphics card versus the CPU? Are there other ways to make it more of a viewport monster than a render monster? For me as well, it seems I would prefer a viewport monster most of the time.
#
28
08-01-2004
, 03:33 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Paris, France
For me the "viewport monster" meant having a big, fast, desk environment (2 screens, good gfx card) with lots of fast disk to load files (both app and data) quickly. A render monster would have been all ram and processors.
That'll do donkey... that'll do...
#
29
08-01-2004
, 03:55 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Connecticut
I came in at 46 seconds on my dual P4 2.8Ghz XEON w/ 2GB RAM
Not bad, considering I dropped less than $1500 on the mo/bo, CPU's, cooling fans, heat sinks, and power supply...
I think the performance would be better if I had a SCSI drive. Right now I'm using a Maxtor 160GB IDE drive.
Also, for some reason, CPU usage only averaged about 80% in performance monitor...
And my machine is of the "viewport monster" variety -- 3DLabs WildcatIII 6210 w/ 428MB RAM and two NEC 18" Flat Panel Displays... No framerate problems here...!
:bgreen:
Last edited by james_s; 08-01-2004 at 04:00 PM.
#
30
08-01-2004
, 04:30 PM
Subscriber
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Paris, France
I'm surprised you only scored 46seconds... I was expecting you to be right there with Emo. With 2GB of RAM, your disk drives aren't even entering into the equation on this render, so that isnt going to improve things.
I'm completely baffled as to why you only see 80% processor usage during the render though... that would drive me nuts! If you could get that 20% to run, you'd be ruling the world!!!
I love having a good card and two monitors... it makes using Maya so much more fluid as you're not always opening and closing windows and panels.
That'll do donkey... that'll do...
You may not post new threads |
You may not post replies |
You may not post attachments |
You may not edit your posts |
BB code is On |
Smilies are On |
[IMG] code is On |
HTML code is Off
|