Wow, this is amazing stuff!! BTW, witchy.. i love the gun . I didnt really expect for people to choose guns for their choice.. but more like handheld things... oh well.. its still in the criteria .. cya later.
"I should call you sugar maple tree cause i'd totally tap that" haha
Lol, eagleking dont loose hope.. it is quite detailed but one thing that i think is bringing down your model is how you have a ball at the back of the gun turret. You could redesign that to be more technical.. something really sharp! Its still great, the machine gun itself is quite detailed and exact. Ok, great job to you too so far witchy . Cya both later.
"I should call you sugar maple tree cause i'd totally tap that" haha
I like your model and, as I have only just finished the model and have just begun texturing you are doing much better than I! I don't think either of them look easy myself.
are you sure the scope is the right size? it lokes so dwarfed...
I realy like your gun. Eagle. maybe if you make your chasis of your a gun a little more detailed it would fill out the thing better. And get the beam stand back!
________________________
AIM: SublimeDragon33
Catch me if i'm on. Always up for a chat.
e-mail: sublimedragon33@gmail.com
It is modelled against several references of the real thing and in the high adjust position.
I think I mentioned this is the first generation optic (distingished at first glance by the single band round the rear eye piece) earlier. Later versions have a raised frontispiece, double banded rear housing, accenuated sight supports, single mid adjuster, seperated inner sight function, oversized rear screw and double coated rubberised central housing. Having trained on both generations of the optic I can say it's about right for a first generation, which is what i set about modelling, but who knows. I am happy enough with it.
You may not post new threads |
You may not post replies |
You may not post attachments |
You may not edit your posts |
BB code is On |
Smilies are On |
[IMG] code is On |
HTML code is Off