Introduction to Maya - Modeling Fundamentals Vol 2
This course will look in the fundamentals of modeling in Maya with an emphasis on creating good topology. It's aimed at people that have some modeling experience in Maya but are having trouble with complex objects.
# 1 28-01-2008 , 05:50 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,055

Specularity map - eccentricity or roll off?

Hi,

when you create a specularity map, is it more properly mapped to the material's eccentricity or roll off node?

cheers,

gubar

# 2 28-01-2008 , 07:15 AM
jsprogg's Avatar
Lifetime Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,712
You should map the specularity to the roll off, but also to get a good spec you should invert the spec map and apply it to the diffuse also, since diffuse effects how much a material relects light.




2 x Modeling Challenge Winner
# 3 28-01-2008 , 12:41 PM
arran's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,708
i always map the spec map to the spec color - is that wrong then?

# 4 28-01-2008 , 01:05 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,055
Hi,

after trying all 3 today, I've actually found that I prefer it applied to the eccentricity. It gives me a look that is closest to my photo reference.

gubar

# 5 28-01-2008 , 01:23 PM
jsprogg's Avatar
Lifetime Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,712

i always map the spec map to the spec color - is that wrong then?

No it's not wrong that is actually what I ment, and some ppl map to eccentricity but that is something different but reading up on the subject from many sources and the most common recomendations say to create realism you need to map the spec colour and diffuse.




2 x Modeling Challenge Winner

Last edited by jsprogg; 28-01-2008 at 01:33 PM.
# 6 28-01-2008 , 01:27 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,055
Hi jsprogg,

rereading my last post, sorry I never thanked you for your contribution.

I've got the diffuse map too, and I have since read that many people map the roll off (and not the eccentricity). In the case of my objects, I just find mapping the eccentricity looks better - guess you just go with what is working the best.

cheers,

gubar

# 7 28-01-2008 , 01:30 PM
arran's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,708
yeah - i've been having a play and mapping to diffuse and roll off works well - though on a couple of objects eccentricity worked good. do you use the same map?

# 8 28-01-2008 , 01:35 PM
jsprogg's Avatar
Lifetime Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,712
The diffuse map is usually less value and from what I have read it recomends inverting the spec map.




2 x Modeling Challenge Winner
# 9 28-01-2008 , 01:40 PM
jsprogg's Avatar
Lifetime Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,712
specularity is a really a fake since it's not actually relecting light and is used to simulate reflectiveness ,where as reflectivity is the real deal and is actually relecting light .
The main difference between them in a 3d package rendertime, since specularity or specular colour is not actually relecting but just changing the colour of the surface to simlate relecting light there is no calculation to be done so therefore a lot quicker to render.




2 x Modeling Challenge Winner
# 10 28-01-2008 , 01:51 PM
arran's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,708
cheers jsprogg - yeah - i've read similar but guess i haven't really done enough experimenting.user added image

# 11 28-01-2008 , 02:10 PM
arran's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,708
do you invert the spec map on the diffuse or roll off?

# 12 28-01-2008 , 02:27 PM
jsprogg's Avatar
Lifetime Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,712
invert the spec map that you would use on the specular colour and apply the inverted map to the diffuse.




2 x Modeling Challenge Winner
# 13 28-01-2008 , 02:33 PM
arran's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 3,708
got you - thanks mate user added image

# 14 28-01-2008 , 03:20 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,055
Hi,

arran, I've used the same map but tweaked the one for diffuse to make it brighter.

Jsprogg are you sure it should be a lower value? I find that gives me a dark surface with bright highlights... which would be good for some surface I guess. Would depend on the material I suppose.

Also, are you sure you should invert it? What you would get in that case would be dark areas with bright highlights, and bright areas with less highlights.

cheers,

gubar

# 15 28-01-2008 , 04:28 PM
jsprogg's Avatar
Lifetime Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,712
It should be lighter , so when I say lower value I am talking in the greyscale sense in which more value is darker.
I am not certain it should be inverted but when I was reading up on it thats what it said, i guess if inverting it makes it lighter then yes.
the way it works as a general rule is the lower the diffuse setting the more reflective someting is noe in Maya I don't remember if that translates to lighter or darker in the diffuse channel.




2 x Modeling Challenge Winner
Posting Rules Forum Rules
You may not post new threads | You may not post replies | You may not post attachments | You may not edit your posts | BB code is On | Smilies are On | [IMG] code is On | HTML code is Off

Similar Threads