Integrating 3D models with photography
Interested in integrating your 3D work with the real world? This might help
# 1 04-10-2011 , 10:41 PM
TravisCowsill's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 135

UPDATED-Bridging issue MAYA 2012-Video example enclosed

HI Forum.

Great place and I am so glad I found yet another resource for my immersion into MAYA. Will definitely be checking out the tutorials and looking forward to interacting with you all.

I'm an intermediate NEWB.I finished the foundation course at 3DTI and am re-entering the program to completion after a moderate hiatus. I hadn't opened MAYA much in that time so I thought I'd update to 2012 (from 2011) and start the intro class again on my own from scratch to dust of my skill set before continuing on in the last portion of the course(s).

I have an issue. I'm constructing a simple room, and more specifically, bridging window boarder frames around its' glass panels.

I'm having the following issue...

All borders around the panes (whether it's 6,4, what have you) will bridge with no problem using a bridge offset of 1. When I get to the final panel (bottom) and only on what would be the left side of the frame, the bridge works fine,but once I then hit offset value, It completely fills the entire open panel boarder with a geometric shape.

If I go in at high speed and muck with it...crashola.

I've re-built the entire window and frame several times now, the geometry is solid and there are no stray edges or faces selected anywhere, as well as have repeated the operation on a second independent window and a then a third of differing shapes, sizes and number of pane frames. Same problem.

Now, I can circumvent this by deleting the left side of the entire window/frame, and mirroring the geometry, so it's work aroundable to get my final object, but it is a problem I foresee dealing with all the time for some reason and I really shouldn't be in theory.

I know how buggy MAYA can be. But any help would be appreciated

Thanks much,
Travis


Last edited by TravisCowsill; 06-10-2011 at 12:10 AM. Reason: UPDATED
# 2 05-10-2011 , 12:21 AM
Gen's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South FL
Posts: 3,522
Could you post a screenie of the problem?


- Genny
__________________
::|| My CG Blog ||::
::|| My Maya FAQ ||::
# 3 05-10-2011 , 02:47 PM
TravisCowsill's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 135
Yes. I'll go into one of the incremental pre-window saves and perform the operation again to the point of error and supply some pics (or maybe a video?)

Later today.

Thanks of the effort guys.

Travis

# 4 06-10-2011 , 04:12 AM
Gen's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South FL
Posts: 3,522
Weird. And all normals are consistent? I couldn't read the history on the goemetry so I don't know what's been done to it. Shot in the dark, did you try deleting history and taking another whack at it?


- Genny
__________________
::|| My CG Blog ||::
::|| My Maya FAQ ||::
# 5 06-10-2011 , 04:42 AM
ctbram's Avatar
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,998
The faces from the bridge appear to be twisted. Scrub the offset control of the bridge node to untwist them. In your video you are adjusting the "Divisions" control of the bridge node which adds more faces between the bridged edges but will not fix the twisting.

user added imageuser added image

And as Gect suggests verify normals and delete history as follows....

Go to the lighting tab and uncheck 2-sided lighting to ensure that the normals are facing the correct direction. mismatched normals will cause the bridge operation to behave unexpectedly.

Also, when you extract faces a group is created along with a tranform node. It is generally a good idea to delete the history on the group.

Also be warned that your boolean has created a hole in the faces with the windows. A hole is a poly face inside another poly face with no connecting edge to the outer edge of the containing face. If you get a message about "... unable to connect to a hole ..." this will be the reason.

user added imageuser added imageuser added imageuser added image


"If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Sir Isaac Newton, 1675

Last edited by ctbram; 06-10-2011 at 02:03 PM.
# 6 06-10-2011 , 11:57 AM
TravisCowsill's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 135
Thanks guys.

I'll take a look over the next couple of days and reply with my results if any. Some of the suggestions were a little advanced for my skill set, but I should be able to figure them out.

I REALLY appreciated everyone's efforts in giving me a little help.

Best for now,
Travis

# 7 06-10-2011 , 10:25 PM
TravisCowsill's Avatar
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 135

The faces from the bridge appear to be twisted. Scrub the offset control of the bridge node to untwist them. In your video you are adjusting the "Divisions" control of the bridge node which adds more faces between the bridged edges but will not fix the twisting.

user added imageuser added image

And as Gect suggests verify normals and delete history as follows....

Go to the lighting tab and uncheck 2-sided lighting to ensure that the normals are facing the correct direction. mismatched normals will cause the bridge operation to behave unexpectedly.

Also, when you extract faces a group is created along with a tranform node. It is generally a good idea to delete the history on the group.

Also be warned that your boolean has created a hole in the faces with the windows. A hole is a poly face inside another poly face with no connecting edge to the outer edge of the containing face. If you get a message about "... unable to connect to a hole ..." this will be the reason.

user added imageuser added imageuser added imageuser added image

Hoorahhhhh!!!!!!!!!!! I scrubbed through the offset to 4 and boom! no more messed up geometry. You were right, I was doing the divisions, but that's what the tutorial said to do and it worked on all the other bridges. But now in this last pane, I did the offset...1 still gave me the messed up geometry at 1. scrubbing to 4 worked great. Though I still think that constitutes a bug, no?

Oh well...Who cares?! I have a proper window now!!!

Thanks man. And for the other image examples you edited in. I owe you a solid.

Travis

# 8 07-10-2011 , 04:18 AM
ctbram's Avatar
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,998
Glad things are fixed.

Bridge will often get twisted like that because maya cannot really know how you want the edges to be bridged. What maya does is orders each edge in a selection and then bridges the edges in between two selection according to each selections edge ordering.

So if the lowest order edge in selection 2 does not match the lowest order edge in selection 1 then the edges will appear twisted. The bridge offset shifts the ordering of the second selection.

The thing is you cannot always predict how the edges are going to be ordered and so it's hard to predict what offset value (if any) will be required to get the correct bridging order. That is why it is almost impossible for a tutorial to tell you an absolute value to enter for the offset in advance (as in your tutorial).

So is not really a bug that you have to enter a value different then what your tutorial says to use. You just need to scrub through values to find the bridge offset that works.


"If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." Sir Isaac Newton, 1675

Last edited by ctbram; 07-10-2011 at 04:21 AM.
Posting Rules Forum Rules
You may not post new threads | You may not post replies | You may not post attachments | You may not edit your posts | BB code is On | Smilies are On | [IMG] code is On | HTML code is Off

Similar Threads