Alfa Romeo 8c

# 1 27-08-2012 , 08:10 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

Been working on this a few days now. I'm kind of lost as to what to do next, the interior is a bit over my head at the moment, and I don't know enough about what goes on underneath a car to be able to start on all that yet.

Any ideas on what more should be done for the main portion of the exterior before detailing? Tips on the rather horrid poly flow would be appreciated aswell ;D

Click to enlarge

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: untitled.59.jpg
Views: 434
Size: 496.3 KB
ID: 52214

Last edited by Acid44; 28-08-2012 at 11:47 PM.

Quote

# 2 28-08-2012 , 11:49 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

Right, I've run into a problem. I need the hexagonal mesh in the image below, to be the same shape as the object in front of it. I know I can do this with a lattice, but I'm not sure how well I could match the shape that way. Any ideas?

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: Problem.JPG
Views: 430
Size: 201.8 KB
ID: 52215

Quote

# 3 29-08-2012 , 12:46 AM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

Ok, now I've used a series of lattices to get to the point that the object has it's main shape. The only thing I need now is to wrap it around the side, so that it fits around the exhaust area like it should (circled area of image)

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: problem2.JPG
Views: 437
Size: 234.2 KB
ID: 52216

Quote

# 4 29-08-2012 , 01:17 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011

Location: Sliema Malta

Posts: 497

Why not do this as a displacement texture?

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: perforated.JPG
Views: 423
Size: 85.6 KB
ID: 52217

Last edited by Chavfister; 29-08-2012 at 01:22 AM.

Quote

# 5 29-08-2012 , 01:19 AM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

I prefer it being 3d, better for close-ups and stuff that way

Quote

# 6 29-08-2012 , 01:23 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011

Location: Sliema Malta

Posts: 497

I attached a photo as a edit to that last comment. Looks pretty decent close up. But then again I only know c4d. Might be harder and diff in Maya.

Quote

# 7 29-08-2012 , 01:31 AM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

it looks decent, but I still prefer things like this being done 3d

Quote

# 8 29-08-2012 , 07:50 AM

The thin red line
Join Date: Aug 2009

Location: England

Posts: 4,472

I think I have to agree with Chavfister I would do it as a displacement then see if I could convert to polys.............dave

Edit:this is just a texture at the mo as I found out later its not good enough for a displacement if I have time will find or make another one

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: grill02b.jpg
Views: 446
Size: 38.1 KB
ID: 52220

Avatar Challenge Winner 2010

Last edited by daverave; 29-08-2012 at 09:50 AM.

Quote

# 9 29-08-2012 , 01:12 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

Displacement map and convert to polys? What's all this about then?

Quote

# 10 29-08-2012 , 01:16 PM

The thin red line
Join Date: Aug 2009

Location: England

Posts: 4,472

If you look in modify/convert/displacement to poly now it might come out like a dogs dinner I dont know.....LOL.........dave

Avatar Challenge Winner 2010

Quote

# 11 29-08-2012 , 01:57 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

Haha, I'll stick to the way I'm doing it then user added image

I'm sure there's some tool that would make it easy that I'm just not thinking of

Quote

# 12 29-08-2012 , 03:03 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011

Location: Sliema Malta

Posts: 497

What about continuing on with the lattice deformer but adding joints and weighting it to wrap it around the mesh. Like I said before. Doing this is not the way to go. But I figure I would attempt to help. You can also go into Zbrush and use a matchmover brush on it to lay it on the surface. In C4D we also have not only a surface deformer but also a shrinkwrap deformer in the character tabs to place things on objects as well.

Quote

# 13 29-08-2012 , 03:13 PM

Acid44

Guest

Posts: n/a

The second half of that first sentence went right over my head. Care to explain?

Quote

# 14 29-08-2012 , 03:35 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011

Location: Sliema Malta

Posts: 497

Technically speaking you would add weighting to the strip of mesh and fold it just like you would a arm. Make sense? Btw that is geo on the bottom pic and not a texture. The very bottom is the surface constraint I was speaking of. I can up the geo to get better curves on the object but as you can see that is what we would do in the case of boots or gloves or jackets. So many ways to skin a cat....

Attached Thumbnails