Maya 2020 fundamentals - modelling the real world
Get halfway through a model and find it's an unworkable mess? Can't add edge loops where you need them? Can't subdivide a mesh properly? If any of this sounds familiar check this course out.
# 1 27-08-2012 , 08:10 PM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a

Alfa Romeo 8c

Been working on this a few days now. I'm kind of lost as to what to do next, the interior is a bit over my head at the moment, and I don't know enough about what goes on underneath a car to be able to start on all that yet.

Any ideas on what more should be done for the main portion of the exterior before detailing? Tips on the rather horrid poly flow would be appreciated aswell ;D

Click to enlarge
user added image user added image
user added image user added image
user added image user added image
user added image user added image

Attached Thumbnails

Last edited by Acid44; 28-08-2012 at 11:47 PM.
# 2 28-08-2012 , 11:49 PM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Right, I've run into a problem. I need the hexagonal mesh in the image below, to be the same shape as the object in front of it. I know I can do this with a lattice, but I'm not sure how well I could match the shape that way. Any ideas?

Attached Thumbnails
# 3 29-08-2012 , 12:46 AM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Ok, now I've used a series of lattices to get to the point that the object has it's main shape. The only thing I need now is to wrap it around the side, so that it fits around the exhaust area like it should (circled area of image)

Attached Thumbnails
# 4 29-08-2012 , 01:17 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sliema Malta
Posts: 497
Why not do this as a displacement texture?

Attached Thumbnails

Last edited by Chavfister; 29-08-2012 at 01:22 AM.
# 5 29-08-2012 , 01:19 AM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a
I prefer it being 3d, better for close-ups and stuff that way

# 6 29-08-2012 , 01:23 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sliema Malta
Posts: 497
I attached a photo as a edit to that last comment. Looks pretty decent close up. But then again I only know c4d. Might be harder and diff in Maya.

# 7 29-08-2012 , 01:31 AM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a
it looks decent, but I still prefer things like this being done 3d

# 8 29-08-2012 , 07:50 AM
daverave's Avatar
The thin red line
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: England
Posts: 4,472
I think I have to agree with Chavfister I would do it as a displacement then see if I could convert to polys.............dave

Edit:this is just a texture at the mo as I found out later its not good enough for a displacement if I have time will find or make another one

Attached Thumbnails



Avatar Challenge Winner 2010

Last edited by daverave; 29-08-2012 at 09:50 AM.
# 9 29-08-2012 , 01:12 PM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Displacement map and convert to polys? What's all this about then?

# 10 29-08-2012 , 01:16 PM
daverave's Avatar
The thin red line
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: England
Posts: 4,472
If you look in modify/convert/displacement to poly now it might come out like a dogs dinner I dont know.....LOL.........dave




Avatar Challenge Winner 2010
# 11 29-08-2012 , 01:57 PM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Haha, I'll stick to the way I'm doing it then user added image I'm sure there's some tool that would make it easy that I'm just not thinking of

# 12 29-08-2012 , 03:03 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sliema Malta
Posts: 497
What about continuing on with the lattice deformer but adding joints and weighting it to wrap it around the mesh. Like I said before. Doing this is not the way to go. But I figure I would attempt to help. You can also go into Zbrush and use a matchmover brush on it to lay it on the surface. In C4D we also have not only a surface deformer but also a shrinkwrap deformer in the character tabs to place things on objects as well.

# 13 29-08-2012 , 03:13 PM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a
The second half of that first sentence went right over my head. Care to explain?

# 14 29-08-2012 , 03:35 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sliema Malta
Posts: 497
Technically speaking you would add weighting to the strip of mesh and fold it just like you would a arm. Make sense? Btw that is geo on the bottom pic and not a texture. The very bottom is the surface constraint I was speaking of. I can up the geo to get better curves on the object but as you can see that is what we would do in the case of boots or gloves or jackets. So many ways to skin a cat....

Attached Thumbnails

Last edited by Chavfister; 29-08-2012 at 03:52 PM.
# 15 29-08-2012 , 04:50 PM
Acid44
Guest
Posts: n/a
That looks like it would work rather well. I'll have a look into that later on, thanks

Posting Rules Forum Rules
You may not post new threads | You may not post replies | You may not post attachments | You may not edit your posts | BB code is On | Smilies are On | [IMG] code is On | HTML code is Off

Similar Threads