Indigo Unbiased Renderer - Page 7 - Simply Maya User Community

# 91 15-05-2006 , 07:25 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

now do it with bidirectional "on" in the inifile, I think it has to be "true"

I GUARANTEE you it will be much faster

How many mutations per pixel did it get? How many per second on average?

If you like Indigo, then be prepared for extremely long rendertimes on complex scenes user added image

. Mine, for the interior WIP, which is in Indigo, is about, say 300k polys. I'm getting 14,000 mutations per second, and (currently, I am rerendering it) now, at 640x480 I have 1265 mutations per pixel, after 7h 33m of rendering.

However, when I tried it on Indigo 0.4, I got 1200 mutations per second. I canceled it after 10 minutes. thats... 12x speed increase user added image

!

The Reduce Noise filter in Photoshop will become your best friend :p

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Last edited by MattTheMan; 15-05-2006 at 07:33 PM.

Quote

# 92 15-05-2006 , 07:51 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 189

aprox. 80000 M/s

I'll d one with bidirectional now user added image

Quote

# 93 15-05-2006 , 08:10 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 189

6 mins and 83000 M/s

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: indigocornell2.jpg
Views: 314
Size: 110.5 KB
ID: 28593

Quote

# 94 15-05-2006 , 08:11 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

yawn... it's so lame that you have to wait for about 3,000 mutations per pixel for a "clean" image...

how many mutations per pixel on yours? And you are using 0.5 right? not 0.4?

and would you mind if I attatched a scene for you to test out too? (its an XML file)

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 95 15-05-2006 , 08:14 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 189

just almost 900 M/p

I know... but atleast it's not you that have to do the work! :p

and would you mind if I attatched a scene for you to test out too? (its an XML file)

Originally Posted by

Okay!

Last edited by arneoog; 15-05-2006 at 08:42 PM.

Quote

# 96 15-05-2006 , 08:16 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

yeah lol!

wait, 900 mutations per pixel? that's pretty grainy! o well, its a mostly GI scene anyway. The cube with caustics that I posted earlier was made with 400 mutations per pixel in 25 mins (about 650 polys)

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 97 16-05-2006 , 12:33 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

I have to warn you, Arneoog and Joopson, and everyone else that might use this renderer (I think Joopson does).

When you are using Physical Sky, especially if there are large openings of light to your scene, the overall quality will be much better if you just use simply path tracing, instead of bidirectional. Bidirectional is much better for mesh emmiters.

I just found that out... my render would have been noise-free (almost) after 12h 30m if I just would have kept simple path tracing user added image

. Oh well, I'm gonna leave it another 2 hours to see what quality I can get then, with bi-dir. Right now it's at 2050 mutations per pixel, rendering at 13,500 mutations per second.

and the scene, I just read your edit:

awww CRAP I deleted it! sorry man!

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 98 16-05-2006 , 07:48 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

well, on my interoior scene, just thought I should say, that I am getting almost 3x more mutations per pixel with path tracing rather then bidir. user added image

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 99 16-05-2006 , 07:54 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: Boston, MA

Posts: 2,314

awesome

darn biderectionals:headbang:

Environment Artist @ Plastic Piranha
www.joopson.com

Quote

# 100 16-05-2006 , 08:04 PM

Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2006

Location: IL

Posts: 1,052

yo all anserw this please,

https://forum.simplymaya.com/showthre...threadid=21552

Quote

# 101 18-05-2006 , 01:25 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

lol- I rendered a single triangle with physical sky and path tracing (with metropolis), for 11 hours, just to see how many mutations per pixel I could get.

I got 8500! user added image

The noise dissapeared (or I sure think it did) around 3000.

Attached Thumbnails

Click image for larger version

Name: tri.jpg
Views: 291
Size: 101.8 KB
ID: 28674

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 102 18-05-2006 , 01:39 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Feb 2006

Location: Australia

Posts: 2,752

man, you guys?? should have taken up rocket science or brain surgery?? You all amaze me, i haven't a clue what your talking about but i wish I did.

you're all crazy user added image

take it easy and life will be easy

Quote

# 103 18-05-2006 , 02:20 AM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

Originally posted by mirek03
you're all crazy

Originally Posted by

sure am, and I'm loving it

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 104 20-05-2006 , 09:50 PM

Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: Fairfield, CT

Posts: 2,436

Hey, arneoog, I see that you have joined the Indigo forum, so we can move our discussions there. My name ther is ThatDude33.

Live the life you love, love the life you live

Quote

# 105 21-05-2006 , 01:07 AM

Subscriber
Join Date: Feb 2006

Location: Australia

Posts: 2,752

quote; The noise dissapeared (or I sure think it did) around 3000.

how did you know, can you watch the render happening? just curious, I haven't got enough time to do 1 frame every 12 hours but it looks pretty deep stuff to me, regular rocket science in the true sense.

take it easy and life will be easy

Quote

Posting Rules Forum Rules

Similar Threads

Topics

Free Courses

Full Courses

VFX News